🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.